Status now:
The illegal compulsory mental health care has ended.
I am working to prove that the illegal compulsory mental health care exactly has been illegal.
The illegal compulsory mental health care is amongst other things called erroneously deprivation of liberty.

The target with 'Law and Learning': To get people to understand a situation related to the law - as fast and cool as possible.

Hypothesis: "They have lost gounds by the law and humanity - become corrupted liars.

"... 22. july 2011 ... ?" - André by the Police in Dale. 30.08.2019
"I feel that I meet a wall." - Doctor Maret Krannich. 27.05.2020
"... he is God." - Doctor Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen about Tom André Tveit. 05.06.2020

What is the main juridicial offense againt me in this case is detention from freedom on the penal code '§173. Abuse of public authority' which bagan 27.05.2020, but also present beneath the prisonment treaths about poisonment wihich is aggrevating.

Here is a map of the situation for the case which among other things shows where the detention happened which were at Askvoll; Øyrane/Vikane where I have an agreement with the government for the vacation included electricity delivered by 'Askvoll kommune' after an agreement with the councilman Håkon Loftheim:

As an addition I can mention that I have for long been wonering about what psychiatry is, especially in practece - now I have been so lucky that I as a completely healthy, totally illiegal, have gotten the opportunity to study the psycjiatry from the inside. 'Law and Learning' is therefore a case I work closely with the psychiatric health care law, with the goal to find out what it is used for - also then a research relating difficult matters we regurarily don't speak much about; in relation to the law. As a human being among my own I hope that my work will make subjects about psychiatry mote common in the everyday in such a way that they and what which is problematic in the meeting of humans and the law, in an easy and good way avoid to become a problem for the society.

What has happend which makes such as; André by the Police in Dale, Doctor Maret Krannich and Cecilie Rebecca Chistophersen, so sickening corrupt, criminal liars?

André - First panic attack: André by the Police in Dale got the 30.08.2020 a panic attack at an interrogation; false accusations and probably roughly violent illegal attack against me was the cause.

Maret Krannich - Second panic attack: Doctor Maret Krannich got a panic attack the 27.05.2020 as which the expression int the introduction relates to, in an probably illegal appointment where she on the basis of false accusations and false concerns takes an illegal decision.
- The illustration in attachment 2 can one also amongst other things se the offenses Maret have done which is amongst other things; a. she ignored my regular doctor Aud Marie Hoel conformation about that I am healthy and have good health, b. she took after what what I know not contact tith the municipal in Bergen where I have my addresse; municipal Finn Markussen, c. she used false accusations and false concerns for an illegal decision, d. she ignored the fact that I am healthy and have a good health, e. / f. on the grounds of bad information Maret Krannich indirectly used force to forced examination wohtout that a real voluntary examination was given, and g. she attempted illegal to take decision on forced examination without the authority to do so.

Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen - The third reaction:
- Pre 05.07.2020: The psycologist Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen is observed to have a diagnosis, or at least, part of a diagnosis as herself call; "confusement of thoughts" in a conversation the 26.06.2020; she had some expression through the face and got asked what they ment, and she gave to different versions for the reason without herself to underline the doubt in which then is present, but were clear on both statements one at a time.
- Past 05.07.2020: I have now been in a conversation with her and in the conversation it got proven "disturbment of thought", something she herself tries to exploit other with by to false accuse that other have it instead (!).
- The expression by her mentioned in the beginning in the introduction is regardrd also as one in a line of false accusations and is so exstremely absurd that it is a reason to believe that is is a danger for a nervous reaction from her when she realizes that what she has talked about is not correct - also the fact that herself has done offenses.

I Tom André Tveit which works with the case; 'Law and Learning'. has a good relation to the law; in the situation for this case do I have good grounds legally, which furtherly give a good self esteem; health.

3 chunks: The 'Law and Learning'-case is mainly founded on false accusations which comes to be spoken about in three chuncks; police documentation with false accusations, false concerns and false accusations and offenses from journals by the health care system.

27.05.2020 - Good health

- Truth: I was then as now in a completely good health
- False accusation: Urgency: Emergency
- Explanation: It comes from the doctors journals 27.05.2020 by Maret Krannich at Askvoll legesenter that the urgency for the case was 'emergency', something which is a fase accusation; I am healthy and have good health now as then. It is therefore a question about why she has come with the false accusation, and in addition to when and how she called for help.

27.05.2020 - Illegal imprisonment

- Paragraph: "The penal code § 173. Misuse of public authority. With prison at the maximum 6 years punished becomes those who by practicing public authority or unrightful imprisonment as a result, or ... c) breaks its duty of service with serious disadvantage, damage or ..."
- Explanation: Maret Krannich broke the mentioned paragraph the 27.05.2020.
- I have charged Maret Krannich for the offense.
- It has been sent a warning til 'Fylkesmannen'.

27.05.2020 - Illegal use of force

- Paragraph: "Psychiatric health care law § 3-1. Examination: Forced psychiatric health care kan not be established without that a doctor personally has examined the one for to bring forward the fact that the reasons for the law for such a health care is fulfilled. The doctor which performs hte examination, shall give a literary statement.
- Explanation: Maret Krannich attempted to use force without to "make it clear that the laws premisses is granted" - at large she got herself a panic attack which os an evidence that I am healthy, also has not broken any laws - she attempted to use force based on false accusations/conserns.
Addition: Maret Krannich experienced a panic attack i an oterwise unorganized appointment where herself expressed; "I feel that I meet the wall." The panic attack can be a sign that the reason to why she broke the law on so many points.
- It has been sent a complaint to the control commission for such decisions - also has it been sent a law suit to the court on the psychiatric health care law §7-1. Today 10.07.2020 I have contacted Askvoll Helsetun by Olaug Søreide about an update to the establishment of the case which amongst others got a copy of the documentation for the case.

11.06.2020 - Treaths of poisonment

- Paragraph: "The penal code § 263. Treaths The one which in words or action treaths with punishable behavior in such cicrumstances that the treath is able to provoce seriois fear, is being punished with a fine or prison up to 1 year."
- Explanation: In a complaint-meeting at the control commission by Haukeland Universitetssykehus did I, Tom André Tveit, the choice to pull the complaint which were for treatment temporary; doctor Ieva leskauskaite replied on this in an incredible way as follows; she treathed about that as for treatment in an eventual continuing "wehere medicaments is an opportunity", it could be favorable not to withdraw the complaint, but process it finished in the meeting. It is clear that medicaments is after the law not necessary - it regards only decisions by need/sickness, in such a way that I as a processor chose to not comment the treath, but fulfill that to withdraw the complaint with my lawyer.
- Today 13.06.2020 kl 18.33 it was delivered to the police in the West a charge of the relation.

23.06.2020 - Contact with my regular doctor

- Paragraph: "The regulation about patients- and userrights in the laws for regular doctors 'Notes to regulation on patient- and usersrights in the regular doctor system to §2 The Right to be on a list at a regular doctor ... The one which has the right to be on the list at a regular doctor, can put forward a wish for a doctor. The wish can be fulfilled as far as it is available places on the regular doctors list, except in those cases as follows after the rules in this regulation. ..."
- Explanation: The doctor Aud Marie Hoel attempted through other doctors yesterday to inform me about that she did not want contact.
- Action: I await until further notice what shall be done to get the right for communication med my regular doctor. See attachment 2 for an illustration which show what my regular doctor have done in this case already.

Question to Åge Løseth:
Is it true that there came extra police officers to your caounty only for the case related to Tom André Tveit?
If yes, this can be an evidence that the police office actively have done propaganda against Tom André Tveit.

Question to Kristian by the police office in Dale:
Is it true that police officers was they who jiggled with a knife as you had confiscated as a tool Tom André Tveit had in his computerbag?
I have not "jiggled a knife" and an answer on this question may be an extra evidence.

Question to Andrine Njøsen by the police offive in Dale:
Is it true that you tried to paint a sickening picture and therefore to indirect petition for a doctoral examination already by establish a case by a charge in August 2019?
By yes, this is a good evidence that the petition sent Maret Krannich was fake; based on false accusations.

I get back my freedom, comes out from the imprisonment in relation to everything which have to do with force to do and get back my fundamental right to be voluntary which I have in an eventual establishment of force the right to be. Furtherly I get removed all false accusations which is 1. by the police, 2. false concerns and 3. false journals by doctors, in such a way that it will not be built more false accusations upon them, but where the truth about myself is what is known to the public - it can be mentioned that my blog is one example about the truth about me.

As mentioned in the section for the reality in this possible conclusion of the case that which is the good, truthful and is legal; I have as said not done something illegal, I have a good health, is healthy, and has as I have done for many years now the right to continue to thrive in private, professional and marketed good politics, where my main business today is as a Fortnite player - something I hope I can continue to do soon with the right for freedom I have.

One probable cocnlusion:
People can become ill because of an irregular relation to the law, in such a way that to loose grounds by offenses, and furtherly as a corrupted being stimulate to improsonment and exploiting of good humans, by among other things calling them 'God' - in this case used the doctor Cecilie Rebecca Chistophersen the expression (!).

In the case shall we look at if the possible conclusion is true - and especially interesting will it be to see what they eventual try to exploit in such a situation.

Addition: Before the case is finished can it furtherly be said that if the coclusion is true, so must de involved place themselvses in the evil as a unit - on this way loose every defense when there is not in the current time laws, cultural grounds which explicitly is evil in relation to what which could be called good which as the term they have used, exactly 'God', would be a part of.

Temporary results: It is now discovered evidences that the doctor Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen has what she calls "disturbement of thoughts", and attempts to transfer this unto others - this is a sign that the form for p0ossible explitment which is mentioned is as to transfer desease from emloyed in the psychiatry unto others (!).

Read the following definition on what a new-militia is before you read the possible conclusion #3:

New-Milita - A state in corruption because of that it is not any longer in respect of its own law with the way that the citizens does not have protection by the law and that the state itself is the danger.

It is only one occation of lack of respect for its own law necessary for a state factical skall come into the definition of what a new-militia is - in 'Law and Learning' it is already a series of offenses experienced, so in spite of the following possible conclusion of the case serious and vast, it is a possibility which os to be evaluated in this case. It is important to mention that I in the situation, captivated from freedom, factical can not leave the place in the immediate time without changes in the situation; I am under treath of poisonment and it is serios negative environment at the place where there is for only days ago possible a suicide happened. I am completely healthy, has not broken any laws, and work hard to get free.

A possible solution: In at least to cases, have I personally experienced that the norwegian judiciary does not respect their own laws - especially in this case there is several who agrees that the judiciary can not be given trust through the laws by that they have experienced similar offenses I have, or at large just by the case 'Law and Learning' alone as an example can it in spite of the enormous impression it will have for a state like Norway and the norwegian judiciary claim that it has become a new-militia, also an organization which run new-terrorism (activities by a new-militia). A new-militia is simply enough a state which does not any longer in respect of its own laws such that the population dows not have protection of their rights any longer, and 'Law and Learning' is an example on this. Furtherly it can also be put forward questions about if there factically has been a will from the norwegian society involved in this case about to as a new-milita to hold myself as a prisoner by imprisonment for to execute me such treaths about imprisonment is a sign of (!).

Offenses on a series of laws, criminal actions only based upon false accusations - and now a treath about poisonment is a sign on that the probable conclusion is real.

Genocide?

In the search for answers on why I have been captured, where there is also a danger of poisonment, there has also been evidentially psychological terror/torture - one of the worst actions there is apart from being murdered, so that a possible conclusion #4 speculate being a crime by war to capture in such a way like a crime of war in extension from a past war, or eventually a secret ongoing war:
Argument #1: I myself on the human basis has done nothing illegal which would equal a such type of action which the case is about; I am healthy, has good health as well, and therefore can one wonder about if it applies to the norwegian people generally, and then maybe look to the second world war and the time thereafter; the past world war period for about if this applies the case as an extension of those punishments as apparently was used on Quisling, Hamsun and other known names just after that war - also attempts to punish forces which were national-socialistic, nazisistic in the war. It is important to add that I have no known bonds, connections to the war which should be attempted used in such a situation; therefore innocently attempted captured also in such a situation - it becomes eventually with the norwgian people as a whole. The last mentioned means that the subject genocide becomes a subject (!), in such a case if this I experience would apply everyone else in a similar situation the case applies to.
Argument #2: If we look at the intimation of attempts on exploiting from the psychologist Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen, so if it should show itself not to be the case that it is attempted to exploit there lacks of reasons for psychiatry when I am healthy and have a good health, and then can one look oposite on the matter; that there furtherly becomes found the same reasons as in argument #1; exactly an extension from the war 1940-1945 that becomes attempted acted against, where I as an innocent on the human level, there it still is as mentioned in argument #1 not any known connections to the war from my side - then becomes it eventually togheter with the norwegian people as a totality. Here also becomes the matter; 'genocide', actual to discuss.

Summary: The conclusion #4 drafts the possibility for that humans innocently becomes attempted captured, imprisoned a place with the danger for poisonment and psychological terror/torture, where it is not just a possibility for that one becomes attempted exploited, but also attempted murdered as a part of a genocide with fundations from the past of world war two in Norway from 1945.

Additions: Until it has come a solution to the case, and/or then an answer to if this conclusion is true or not, so can it be significantly to ask oneself, and therefore also stands the possibility to being drafted, even how serious it is.

The fifth possible conclusion is within the subject of sabotage of my networks; I have been moved three times if one adds with the environment in Askvoll I was a part of before I got captured, and now it is in planning a fourth transfer (!). The question is that if it exists a connection between that I becomes known in an environment and a will to to transfer.

In the main section 2 I work with possible repercussions after the terror 22. july, and I hoveddel 2 bearbeider jeg mulige ettervikninger etter terroren 22. juli, og what they eventually could have to say for the society in Norway - a possible aftermath.

A genociede with source from the massacre the 22. july?*
A genocide on the grounds of paranoia after the massacre on Utøya the 22. july?*

*Until it is proven wrong is a possible conclusion and end to the main section 1, stands the sentences above as they appear now.

To this case becomes it after the possible conclusion #4 relating genocide in main section 1 worked with to defferent possible grounds to an eventual genocide with the source in the terror attack 22. july 2011. The terror attack was an extreme action which can have hit the society in a brutal way also in the retrospect of the attack and it will be worked on to possiblities:
A. The terror attack 22. july 2011 which a beginning on a long-term planned genocide.
B. The terror attack 22. july 2011 as a ground for a paranoia which furtherly has developed itself to become a genocide.

Affiliation between the case 'Law and Learning' and the main section 2 - 22. july 2011:

1. The police officer Andrine Njøsen by the police office in Fjaler menitoned Breivik in a charge based on false accusations in August 2019 - entirely unreservedly. Is it paranoia?
2. The police offer Andrine Njøsen by the police office in Fjaler menitoned manifest as anout a similarity to Anders Behring Breivik in a charge based on false accusations in August 2019 - entirely unreservedly. Is it paranoia?
3. The police officer André from the police office in Dale, Fjaler, asked repeatedly in August 2019 about the 22. july subject, and got a panic attack and hade to take a break from interrogations underway. Is it paranoia?
4. I was captured 27.05.2020 with grounds from a petition from the police accurately Fjaler which is mentioned in the three points above, entirely surprisingly, where it is a question about it is a part of a genocide, and then possibly as a continuation of what which was initiated by the massacre at Utøya 22. july 2011 either by possibility A. or B..

Affiliation between 22. july 2011 and the psychiatry as a unit shows in the following sketch about the sheriff by Fjaler police office in Dale:

From the sketch above it is a very clear connection between the subject 22. july 2011, the police and psychiatry which means that I can be either be captured because of an ongoing genocide with the fundation in the terror 22. july 2011 and/or on the grounds of a paranoia in the society in the aftermath of 22. july 2011.

Question to Andrine Njøsen by the police office in Dale:
Is it true that the police has become paranoid after the terror attacks 22. july 2011; and if yes, have this hit Tom André Tveit since you mentioned 22. july explicitly both in a charge and in an interrogation in August 2019?

"The last known lovestory?"

A genocide with source in hate against love?*

*Until is is proven wrong that hate agaoinst love is the cause for a possible genocide treated in the case 'Law and Learning', can the sentence above stand as it is now.

For everything which has to do with love, can one go in to ITAT.no, furtherly go to 'Om ITAT' and from there 'Private utgivelser' which is about love and see the collection of poems - in norwegian.

{It comes more about this by a later occation - already now it becomes presented a sketch which shows a connection between 22. july 2011 terror, and an vacation I had to Great Britain with the purpose to weave togheter the love poem collection; 'Min kjærleik til deg' and my own journey. The sketch shows how it can be a connection to my journey, and the terror 22. july 2011.}

It is also mentioned that the first sentence which subjects the difference bewteen known and unknown love, where I myself in the present time regards love between couples to be suitable as a secret, especially if it has to do with getting children togheter, so it can be furtherly be so that the love story I can present in this main section could be used to show a known type, where furtherly it may be made an example of; there if others shae knowledge about it, can this be an occation to share what one know. Så be my guest if one wants to show something - the history has amongst other things been partly presented in social medias.

At last for this time I put forward a 8&8 about imprisonment; I mean I am totally healthy and when I have done nothing illegal, then when it regards other than myself can they themselvses place themselvses into one of the squares which should fit; innocent, then into freedom as in The Good in the upper section, and for others into imprisonment below if that is just. This I put forward so that noone can compare me with someone that is a criminal; I have done nothing wring in relation to the case:

In the main section 4 it will be worked on if Law and Learning is about some of mu, Tom André Tveit's, properties is the cause for the case as a whole. Especially intellectual properties can have something to do with the case.

Question to Åge Løseth by the police office in Dale:
Is it true that the cause fot that a police case was estabilshed in August 2019 was because of Tom André Tveit's properties?
If yes; since Tom André Tveit had some goods from Verda forlag in his camping wagon which got searched; can the establishment have something to do with one of Tom André Tveit's propeties to do as in example Verda publishing house?

Even if there is borders for what which one can present to the court, so on the grounds that the opposition in the case is the one that put forward subjects relating to the divine there is an opstion to ask questions by this from my side - it will therefore become a question to this main section in spite of that it will in advance not necessary the meaning to use the answer to the main work in relation to the result of the case. It can be added that should the court find it unreasonable to put forward the subject relating to the divine it is the opposition which has taken initiative to do so according to decision in the second attachment by Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen.

Question to Andrine Njøsen Helgås, Åge Løseth, Maret Krannich and Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen:
For this case it has been put forward an statement that I am God - is it true that this is the foundation for the case, as for instance that it is present an attempt to rob divine properties?

XX.XX.XXXX XX:XX
It may be happended a suicide today at the building where I am imprisoned. Several assistants were quit and looked mourning by a room; they also had gloves on them.

16.06.2020 15.40
Today it is comfirmed that I chose weel when I withdrew a complaint in a complaint meeting by the control commission 11.06.2020 - a new complaint is sent, and it is now probably that the pemisses for the meeting is in such a way that the case will be processed mot after what I have invisioned; it is a wish to treat the case as thoroughly and straightforwardly as possible to increase the amount of possibilites to get the case treated satifactionately.

24.06.2020 15.10
Today I had a conversation with the municipal in Bergen Finn Markussen - especially to try to establish the work to show that Maret Krannich as a municipal in Askvoll did wrong by trying to apply the psychiatric health care law §3-1, without having contact with Finn Markussen which after his own statement is the one who eventually should be who applied the paragraph if it should be necessary when I had adress in Bergen and only was on a vacation in Askvoll. I add that Finn Markussen up to several times laughed along the conversation; clearly can he not understand the seriousness as one of the citizen in Bergen have been captured illegally by imprisonment and is in danger of being poisoned - namely I.

25.06.2020 about 11.00
I got today an evidence for the possible conclusion #2 (!). In a conversation with the doctor Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen, she attempted to describe signs of sickness, amongst other things "confusement of thoughts" - something she just before had been realizing herself in this way: When I talked she raised her eyebrows, and I used the opportunity to ask why she did, and in her answer, where I saw it correct to use a little time on this, she said; 1. that she "did not knew about it", and 2. that "it had to do with the dialouge with me!, where the two quotes show clearly a confusion and doubt on which reasons she raised her eyebrows by.
That to focus on such things can have been clever for to try to get the large amount illegal attitude involved in the case show, but especially it it is intereseting to use the opportunity in a conversation with such a doctor with speciality into psychology to work on sich behaviors - furtherly it is a proof for that she just herself is sick, and then indirectly decided as a specialist in psychology whicj gives it a certain wight professionally, and which I shall get into on an evidence which gives grounds for to claim that the conclusion #2 factically is real; the psychiatry capture humans illegally, furtherly attempts to transfer their own deseases unto the prisoners which is imorisoned (!). It is disturbing results. It can also be added to this that the diary note gives evidence for psycological terror, psychological torture.
I can mention that the doctor Sebastian and his assistant Torwald was present at the conversation and therfore witnesses to the event.

27.06.2020 omlag kl 09:30
Psychopaty in employer Robert which is a person for contact today. I asked if I could get a print of notes/journals from other employers than the doctors - when it looks like it is a danger of that the attempt to poison me is ascalating on the basis of false accusations which possibly is noted down, ant on the task to get such a print Robert became furious and amongst other things before he ended the conversation without result about getting such a print he said: "It is most likely something you have asked for in the past, and therefore I can not help you." It is an totally unusual psychopathic innuendo.

28.06.2020 12:00
There came an employer to the room without having any reasons for doing so, but after a short conversation he said it "was because of the time".

29.06.2020 11.38
I called the Health Minister Bent Høie today; I got the information that he had taken vacation, and is else working a lot at home because of the coronasituation. Therefore it can be difficult to reach him.

03.07.2020 17:06:
They had made to different type of buns today; one with salt and one with cheese; I got the one with salt and wondered about I could get one with cheese as well; "No.", said the staff, it was only one for each, and they said; "Yes.", to that they treated them as they were the same type after a question about this from me.

04.07.2020 17:06:
The tendensy is ever increasing rules. Today denied Karen myself coffe 10:03, when she means serving of coffe last from 16:00 to 17:00 - earlier one has gotten coffe until it were empty on the can, maker; it were still more left when U asked.

13.07.2020 16:00:
'B...', a patient, knocked on a wall; an employee, Martine, checked and the patient both lied and admitted to have knocked. The employee neglected apparently eventual actions.

17.07.2020 16:50:
Bård, someone who works where I am imprisoned said; "Good morning", to me...

XX.XX.XXXX XX:XX:
Thor K. Bohnhorst walks with a knife in a very peculiar way in his hand in the common areal.

18.07.2020 22:25:
Trond is clearly angry, furious - in such a condition that they deny to ansmer questions about one is it. I asked; "I can see that you are shaking and looks furious, is that a fact?", no answer, and also I asked about the name and he asked me in return instead of answering - I said; "Tom André", and he said then Trond. Furtherly so when he had served me food he made some noises with the mouth and I asked if he made those as a part of the furiousness and he did not answer.
The same; Trond, said 19.07.2020 00:41; "Fy faen!" (Cursed), also then I asked about fruits which is common at night if one is interested.

19.07.2020 12:40:
Thor K. Bohnhorst, an employee, is conserned about his "security for rights", and encouraged to a conversatrion about the use of phone with camera.

20.07.2020 13:19:
The assistant Odin slammed the door to my room after a shorter conversation. Clearly was it aggression he attempted to get out by being harder with the door than ususal.

20.08.2020 15:33:
On the basis of some extreme movements by the assistant Ruth at a conversation with the doctor ieva Leskauskaite today I asked her if she had som problems with her nerves; "No ...", se replied. Furtherly can it be mentioned that Ieva Leskauskaite was asked about the subject; genicode, and got clearly upset by the quistion; nervous.

21.07.2020 09:25:
"Remember to come within the time next time!", colest to screamed one of the employees after that I had got breakfast within the time; 'one hour' after that the breakfast began at 08:15. Since I arrived the prison I am in now all meals has lasted one hour after they began, and it has been expressed by the most eomplyees and as an ordinary truth at the department - today which about never heven heard of amonst 2-3 employees at the kitchen; Kornelia, Sølvi ampnst others.

21.07.2020 15:33:
Attempts on to press me for to spend time outside: Konrelia says relating to that I have got opportuniy to be on a terrace on my own; "nice if you use it" so you can move on and advance.

22.07.2020 16.03:
An employee denied myself food - meals have been lasting one hour after the given time since I came to the prison I am currently in - this fact are they now disputing. Dinner begins at 16.

30.07.2020 13:10:
I have today been in a conversation with Doctors Without Borders.

19.08.2020 16.50:
An employee were I am went within the 1 meter rule in regards of the corona situation when it seems that I was attempted to be pressed into a conversation.

20.08.2020 09.05:
Torbjørn, an employee where I am currently, took on a cup on the kitchen table and went away from the table and clearly mumled and spoke to himself - then went back to the kitchen table again and took on the same cup again one more time before he went to get a new cup.

23.08.2020 12.34:
Torbjørn is sitting in a couch talking to himself.

24.08.2020 15.50:
An employee, Magnar, there where I am now talked and used the terms; 'osteguden' and 'kristost'. {Translation of the terms; 'cheesegod' and 'christcheese'}

26.08.2020 15.10:
An employee, Kristine, where I am now believed it was tuesday; it is wednesday today.

27.08.2020 11.50:
An employee, Lisbeth, where I am now said; "we must see that you live well where you live now" in regards especially my camping wagon.

30.08.2020 19.30:
An employee, Anne Lene, where I am now told about a family member which clearly had a mark of to be paranoid.

10.09.2020 19.35:
An emlpyee, Frank, expresses something about art; "blure up in a corner - that you can forget."

18.09.2020 11.00:
I asked for a copy on paper for all documentation from the place where I am now, and got in return amongst other somatic journal from Voss many many years ago as an addition (!) - unprofessional treatment of documents.

*If 'No' on 'Ongoing Work' it means they have adtmitted that they do not help in the situation. It can be added that it can anyhow be useful to establish a dialogue for advice, information.

Lov og Læring - Situasjonen den 07.07.2020
Lov og Læring - Situasjonen den 01.08.2020
Lies about Me (1st Edition)
Lies about Me (5th Edition)

Additions to the publication 'Lies about Me':
Addition 1a - Åge Løseth with possibly fake stamp
Addition 1b - Åge Løseth with possibly fake stamp
Addition 2 - Writing Error on Requisition 16.12.2021
Addition 3 - Note about good health 22.12.2021
Addition 4 - Note with a shocking comment 02.09.2021
Addition 5a - The notes of Dr Nyland at meeting 22.12.2021 - Page 1
Addition 5b - The notes of Dr Nyland at meeting 22.12.2021 - Page 2
Addition 5c - The notes of Dr Nyland at meeting 22.12.2021 - Page 3
Addition 5d - The notes of Dr Nyland at meeting 22.12.2021 - Page 4
Addition 6 - Notes from meeting 27.01.2022
Addition 7 - Notes from meeting 16.03.2022
Addition 8 - Establishing case on 'Liar 10', Trond Arne Asperheim 07.10.2022
Addition 9 - Response on the case on 'Liar 10', Trond Arne Asperheim

1 Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen - Decision 05.06.2020
1b Cecilie Rebecca Christophersen - Decision 05.06.2020
2 Illsutration of the offenses by Maret Krannich 23.06.2020
3 Illustration over the 3 chuncks with false accusations inluded offenses
4 Article - The rule of law in the health care sector
5 Article - About Rhyck
6 List of ways to get released
7 Map over the situation for the case
8 Rhyck - A sketch
9 Article - Hjernevask - Tidenes meningsløse skandale [Currently not translated]
10 Video - Just before illegal decision 27.05.2020
11 Sketch - Unreasonable Conversation
12 Sketch - Rhyck - Amnesty & Damnestyn
13 Article - Doctors - Modern butchers?'
15 An Hour 27.05.2020
16 A weak point for Norway
17 An evil developement
18 Sheriff Åge Løseth
19 Norway after the 22. july 2011
20 Effects by Rhyck
21 Dreams and Claims
22 Note about liberation 06.08.2020
23 About releasement